S t r u t - a n d - T i e   R e s o u r c e   W e b   S i t e
 

Home Strut-and-Tie Method (STM) Code Provisions

Site Map

Code Provisions

B- and D-RegionsHistorical Background | Strut-and-Tie Models | Design Process |
Code Provisions | Worked Design Examples | References

STM design provisions consist of rules for defining the dimensions and ultimate stress limits of struts and nodes as well as the requirements for the distribution and anchorage of reinforcement. Guidelines [5, 6] for design by the STM have been developed for European practice. Provisions for the STM have been incorporated in the Canadian Concrete Design Code [7, 8] since 1984 and in the AASHTO LRFD [9, 10] code since 1994. Another specific set of provisions has been developed to be included as an alternative design procedure in the 2002 ACI code [11].

Table 1 and Table 2 show examples of stress limits and strength reduction factors defined in ACI Code and AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, respectively. As shown in the tables, there are substantial differences in the rules used in these provisions and guidelines because of uncertainties associated with defining the characteristics of an idealized truss within a continuum of structural concrete.

 

Table 1  Stress Limits and Strength Reduction Factors According to ACI 318-02 Appendix A [11]

Stress Limits,

 

Struts:

  where:

for prismatic struts in uncracked compression zones
for struts in tension members
struts may be bottle shaped and crack control reinforcement is included
struts may be bottle shaped and crack control reinforcement is not included
for all other cases
specified concrete compressive strength

  Note:

Crack control reinforcement requirement is , where  = steel ratio of the i-th layer of reinforcement crossing the strut under review, and = angle between the axis of the strut and the bars.

  Nodes:
  where:

when nodes are bounded by struts and/or bearing areas
when nodes anchor only one tie
when nodes anchor more than one tie

Strength Reduction Factors,

 

for struts, ties, and nodes

 

Table 2  Stress Limits and Strength Reduction Factors According to AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications 2nd Edition [10]

Stress Limits,

 

Struts:

  where:

=
= smallest angle between the strut under review and the adjoining ties
* = average tensile strain in the tie direction
= specified concrete compressive strength

 

Note:

The stress limit assumes a minimum distributed reinforcement of 0.003 in each direction is provided.

 

Nodes:

  where:

when nodes are bounded by struts and/or bearing areas
when nodes anchor only one tie
when nodes anchor more than one tie

Resistance Factors,

 

for struts and nodes
for ties

 

B- and D-RegionsHistorical Background | Strut-and-Tie Models | Design Process |
Code Provisions | Worked Design Examples | References

Site Map | Contact Us | Copyright Info

Back to Top

Home | In the News | Strut-and-Tie Method | CAST Design Tool

NSF CAREER Award Project | Other Educational Resources

Q & A | Related Links

This page was created and is maintained by Tjen Tjhin
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Last update: June 01, 2002